The evolution of election campaigns: Eroding political engagement?
نویسندگان
چکیده
There is widespread agreement that the process of election campaigning, particularly the roles of parties and the news media, have been transformed during recent decades. Many are concerned that these developments have generated widespread apathy, or even alienation, from the traditional modes of electoral participation in representative democracies. This tendency is thought to be particularly pronounced among the young. To examine these issues, Part I sets out a theoretical model for understanding the evolution of modern campaigns. Part II considers why these developments may be expected to have produced an erosion of common forms of campaign activism. Part III describes the source of evidence used to analyze these issues, drawing upon the 15-nation European Social Survey, 2002 (ESS), and the methods of cohort analysis which are used here to examine campaign activism. Part IV compares cohort analysis of campaign activism, including through voting and party work, with cause activism. The conclusion considers the implications of these results, and suggests that experience of changes in election campaigns have not been associated with an erosion of civic engagement.
منابع مشابه
The Internet and the 2004 European Parliament Election in Britain Electoral Context and Contest Supply Incentives and Demand Barriers to Online Electoral Campaigns
This article examines the use of the Internet by a range of political actors in the 2004 European Parliament election in Britain—candidates, citizens, parties, government, pressure groups, and the media. Specifically, it surveys the structure of online political communications and the amount and nature of electoral information and engagement opportunities available to citizens in the framework ...
متن کاملElection Campaigns as Information Campaigns: Who Learns What and with What Effect?
During election campaigns political parties compete to inform voters about their leaders, the issues, and where they stand on these issues. In that sense, election campaigns can be viewed as a particular kind of information campaign. Democratic theory supposes that participatory democracies are better served by an informed electorate rather than an uninformed one. But do all voters make equal i...
متن کاملReforming India’s Party Financing and Election Expenditure Laws
Competitive political parties and election campaigns are central to the health of democracies. Parties and campaigns require significant resources to be effective. India has developed complex election expenditure, political party funding, and reporting and disclosure laws. We suggest that these laws may have perverse impacts on the electoral system: they tend to drive campaign expenditure under...
متن کاملIf You Build a Political Web Site, Will They Come?
Synopsis: The core issue for this study concerns the social and political consequences of the rise of knowledge societies, in particular the capacity of the Internet for strengthening democratic participation, social capital, and civic engagement in Britain. To consider these issues, Part I summarizes debates about the impact of the Internet on the public sphere. The main influence of this deve...
متن کاملObama's wired campaign: lessons for public health communication.
For those who still question the value of new media in public health campaigns, the election of Barack Obama as the 44 president of the United States can be instructive. Obama’s campaign strategy has been heralded for its impressive ability to reach, engage, and inspire supporters. The high level of public involvement was evident in the record numbers of people who volunteered, donated money, a...
متن کامل